Home
2439774169_a700784c1d_o.jpg
Welcome to the Frontpage

Civil Litigation Experts

Our Mission: We at SMT Law are committed to providing our clients with legal representation of the highest legal and ethical standards, keeping our clients informed and obtaining excellent results in an efficient manner.

courthouse
 
Copyright © 2010 Sheuerman, Martini & Tabari - A Professional Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
 

Legal Top Stories

LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Legal News
Headline Legal News from LexisNexis®
LexisNexis® Headline Legal News
  • U.S. Supreme Court Rules Attorneys Are Debt Relief Agencies
    WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on March 8 affirmed an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that attorneys are debt relief agencies when they provide qualifying services but reversed the appellate court's ruling that a portion of the federal bankruptcy abuse act governing what advice such relief agencies can give to clients is unconstitutionally overbroad and violates the First Amendment rights of attorneys (United States of America v. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, et al., No. 08-1225; Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, et al. v. United States of America, No. 08-1119, U.S. Sup.). Full story on lexis.com
  • Student Injured In 1992 Trampoline Accident Agrees To $14.6M Settlement
    CHICAGO - A $14.6 million settlement was reached Feb. 24 in an Illinois circuit court, bringing to a close an action involving a student who broke his neck and was rendered quadriplegic while using a mini trampoline during an extracurricular tumbling class more than 17 years ago (Ryan Murray, et al. v. Chicago Youth Center, et al., No. 2007 L 3832, Ill. Cir., Cook Co.). Full story on lexis.com
  • Insurer Entitled To Rescind Policy, Federal Judge Rules
    SAN FRANCISCO - Material misrepresentations on an employment practices liability policy application entitle the insurer to rescind the policy, a California federal judge ruled Feb. 17 (Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. v. RDD Inc., et al., No. C 09-00856, N.D. Calif.; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13633). Full story on lexis.com